Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores 20.5 points higher (29.7 vs 9.2) but costs 4.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1935 vs $405; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need intelligence above 9.2, and Qwen3 Coder Next when 9.2 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.7 | 9.2 | −69.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 69.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,935.39 | $405.10 | −79.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 79.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.90s | 6.44s | −74.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 74.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 69.0% less intelligence, 79.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 74.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill