Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Kimi K3 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or Kimi K3 (Low) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3 (Low) scores 7.9 points higher (30.1 vs 22.2) but costs 3.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1190 vs $366; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3 (Low) when you need intelligence above 22.2, and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite when 22.2 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Kimi K3 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.2 | 30.1 | +35.6% Kimi K3 (Low) is 35.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $365.63 | $1,190.42 | +225.6% Kimi K3 (Low) is 3.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.69s | 57.21s | +558.3% Kimi K3 (Low) is 558.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Kimi K3 (Low) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 35.6% more intelligence, 225.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 558.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Kimi K3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteKimi K3 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/kimi-k3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/kimi-k3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill