Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Llama 4 Scout
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or Llama 4 Scout by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scores 15.7 points higher (22.2 vs 6.5) but costs 5.0× as much to run the benchmark ($366 vs $73.6; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite when you need intelligence above 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout when 6.5 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 4 Scout | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.2 | 6.5 | −70.7% Llama 4 Scout is 70.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $365.63 | $73.56 | −79.9% Llama 4 Scout is 79.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.51s | 4.99s | −47.5% Llama 4 Scout is 47.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $0.18 / $0.66 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 70.7% less intelligence, 79.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 47.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteLlama 4 ScoutToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/llama-4-scout · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/llama-4-scout?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill