Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 19.4% more intelligence, 21.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 33.6% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.2 | 26.5 | +19.4% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 19.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $365.63 | $286.07 | −21.8% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 21.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.50s | 6.31s | −33.6% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 33.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteNemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill