Gemini 3.5 Flash (Minimal) vs GPT-5.2 (Xhigh)

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Minimal) vs GPT-5.2 (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemini 3.5 Flash (Minimal)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
23.80
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
30.40
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemini 3.5 Flash (Minimal)GPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)23.830.4+27.7% GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) is 27.7% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)3.43s131.52s+3734.4% GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) is 3734.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.50 / $9.00$1.75 / $14.0
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemini 3.5 Flash (Minimal): what beats itGPT-5.2 (Xhigh): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-minimal/gpt-5-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-minimal/gpt-5-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill