Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs GLM-5.3-Flash
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GLM-5.3-Flash
GLM-5.3-Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 28.2% more intelligence, 92.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 136.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | GLM-5.3-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 41.8 | +28.2% GLM-5.3-Flash is 28.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $305.52 | −92.8% GLM-5.3-Flash is 92.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.46s | 38.89s | +136.3% GLM-5.3-Flash is 136.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $0.15 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- GLM-5.3-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)GLM-5.3-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/glm-5-3-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/glm-5-3-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill