Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) scores 8.5 points higher (32.6 vs 24.1) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($4222 vs $1524; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh).
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 24.1 | −26.1% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 26.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $1,524.02 | −63.9% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 63.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.52s | 115.75s | +600.7% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 600.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $0.75 / $4.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 26.1% less intelligence, 63.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 600.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/gpt-5-4-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/gpt-5-4-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill