Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) scores 4.1 points higher (32.6 vs 28.5) but costs 9.4× as much to run the benchmark ($4222 vs $449; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 28.5, and GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) when 28.5 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 28.5 | −12.6% GPT-6 Sol (Non-reason… is 12.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $449.37 | −89.4% GPT-6 Sol (Non-reason… is 89.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.65s | 6.01s | −63.9% GPT-6 Sol (Non-reason… is 63.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 12.6% less intelligence, 89.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 63.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill