Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) scores 23.3 points higher (32.6 vs 9.3) but costs 96× as much to run the benchmark ($4222 vs $44.0; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 9.3 | −71.5% Llama 4 Maverick is 71.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $43.98 | −99.0% Llama 4 Maverick is 99.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.46s | 10.82s | −34.3% Llama 4 Maverick is 34.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 71.5% less intelligence, 99.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 34.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill