Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 16.3% more intelligence, 97.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 197.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 37.9 | +16.3% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 16.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $109.55 | −97.4% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 97.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.65s | 49.53s | +197.5% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 197.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill