Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 31.0% more intelligence, 93.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 37.4% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 42.7 | +31.0% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 31.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $283.18 | −93.3% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 93.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.54s | 22.73s | +37.4% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 37.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill