Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) scores 26.6 points higher (32.6 vs 6.0) but costs 112× as much to run the benchmark ($4222 vs $37.6; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 6.0 | −81.6% Ministral 3 14B is 81.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $37.56 | −99.1% Ministral 3 14B is 99.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.71s | 8.05s | −51.8% Ministral 3 14B is 51.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 81.6% less intelligence, 99.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 51.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Ministral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill