Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs Mistral Small 3.1
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or Mistral Small 3.1 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) scores 25.5 points higher (32.6 vs 7.1) but costs 152× as much to run the benchmark ($4222 vs $27.8; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 7.1, and Mistral Small 3.1 when 7.1 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | Mistral Small 3.1 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 7.1 | −78.2% Mistral Small 3.1 is 78.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $27.82 | −99.3% Mistral Small 3.1 is 99.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.65s | 11.99s | −28.0% Mistral Small 3.1 is 28.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $0.08 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 3.1 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 78.2% less intelligence, 99.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 28.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Mistral Small 3.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Mistral Small 3.1Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/mistral-small-3-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/mistral-small-3-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill