Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs Mistral Small 3.2
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) scores 25.6 points higher (32.6 vs 7.0) but costs 35× as much to run the benchmark ($4222 vs $122; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 7.0, and Mistral Small 3.2 when 7.0 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | Mistral Small 3.2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 7.0 | −78.5% Mistral Small 3.2 is 78.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $121.78 | −97.1% Mistral Small 3.2 is 97.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.52s | 12.54s | −24.1% Mistral Small 3.2 is 24.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $0.07 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 3.2 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 78.5% less intelligence, 97.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 24.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Mistral Small 3.2Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill