Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) vs GPT-6 Astra (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) by Google or GPT-6 Astra (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Max) scores 18.7 points higher (52.7 vs 34.0) but costs 3.3× as much to run the benchmark ($5324 vs $1614; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Max) when you need intelligence above 34.0, and Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) when 34.0 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) | GPT-6 Astra (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.0 | 52.7 | +55.0% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 55.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,614.42 | $5,324.10 | +229.8% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 3.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.55s | 285.78s | +1361.8% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 1361.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Max) vs Gemini 3.6 Flash (High): 55.0% more intelligence, 229.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1361.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GPT-6 Astra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Gemini 3.6 Flash (High)GPT-6 Astra (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-6-flash/gpt-6-astra · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-6-flash/gpt-6-astra?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill