Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) vs Kimi K3 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) by Google or Kimi K3 (Low) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) scores 3.9 points higher (34.0 vs 30.1) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1614 vs $1190; both premium class). Pick Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K3 (Low).
| Metric | Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) | Kimi K3 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.0 | 30.1 | −11.5% Kimi K3 (Low) is 11.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,614.42 | $1,190.42 | −26.3% Kimi K3 (Low) is 26.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.02s | 57.21s | +217.5% Kimi K3 (Low) is 217.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Kimi K3 (Low) vs Gemini 3.6 Flash (High): 11.5% less intelligence, 26.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 217.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Kimi K3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 3.6 Flash (High)Kimi K3 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-6-flash/kimi-k3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-6-flash/kimi-k3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill