Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) vs Llama 4 Scout
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) by Google or Llama 4 Scout by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) scores 27.5 points higher (34.0 vs 6.5) but costs 22× as much to run the benchmark ($1614 vs $73.6; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout when 6.5 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) | Llama 4 Scout | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.0 | 6.5 | −80.9% Llama 4 Scout is 80.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,614.42 | $73.56 | −95.4% Llama 4 Scout is 95.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.02s | 5.00s | −72.3% Llama 4 Scout is 72.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.18 / $0.66 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini 3.6 Flash (High): 80.9% less intelligence, 95.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 72.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
Gemini 3.6 Flash (High)Llama 4 ScoutToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-6-flash/llama-4-scout · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-6-flash/llama-4-scout?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill