Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) by Google or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 18.4 points higher (52.4 vs 34.0) but costs 3.6× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $1614; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 34.0, and Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) when 34.0 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.0 | 52.4 | +54.1% Muse Wonder (Max) is 54.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,614.42 | $5,786.78 | +258.4% Muse Wonder (Max) is 3.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.59s | 40.70s | +131.4% Muse Wonder (Max) is 131.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Gemini 3.6 Flash (High): 54.1% more intelligence, 258.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 131.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Gemini 3.6 Flash (High)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-6-flash/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-6-flash/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill