Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) by Google or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) scores 14.0 points higher (39.8 vs 25.8) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1100 vs $993; both premium class). Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.7 Code.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.8 | 25.8 | −35.2% Kimi K2.7 Code is 35.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,100.06 | $992.88 | −9.7% Kimi K2.7 Code is 9.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 46.75s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium): 35.2% less intelligence, 9.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill