Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) by Google or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) scores 33.8 points higher (39.8 vs 6.0) but costs 29× as much to run the benchmark ($1100 vs $37.6; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.8 | 6.0 | −84.9% Ministral 3 14B is 84.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,100.06 | $37.56 | −96.6% Ministral 3 14B is 96.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 6.97s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium): 84.9% less intelligence, 96.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)Ministral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill