Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs GLM-5.2 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google or GLM-5.2 (Max) by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)
GLM-5.2 (Max) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 17.6% less intelligence, 29.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 9.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | GLM-5.2 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.9 | 33.7 | −17.6% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 17.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,622.73 | $2,097.29 | +29.2% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 29.2% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.13s | 30.10s | −9.1% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 9.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $1.40 / $4.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GLM-5.2 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)GLM-5.2 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/glm-5-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/glm-5-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill