Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google or Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) scores 26.9 points higher (40.9 vs 14.0) but costs 6.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1623 vs $250; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 14.0, and Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) when 14.0 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.9 | 14.0 | −65.8% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 65.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,622.73 | $250.37 | −84.6% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 84.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.13s | 5.89s | −82.2% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 82.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $1.25 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 65.8% less intelligence, 84.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/grok-4-3-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/grok-4-3-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill