Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs Kimi K3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google or Kimi K3 (Max) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3 (Max) scores 2.7 points higher (43.6 vs 40.9) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($3658 vs $1623; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Kimi K3 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.8 Flash (High).
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | Kimi K3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.9 | 43.6 | +6.6% Kimi K3 (Max) is 6.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,622.73 | $3,658.07 | +125.4% Kimi K3 (Max) is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.13s | 63.08s | +90.4% Kimi K3 (Max) is 90.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Kimi K3 (Max) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 6.6% more intelligence, 125.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 90.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Kimi K3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)Kimi K3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/kimi-k3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/kimi-k3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill