Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs Mistral Large 3
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google or Mistral Large 3 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) scores 31.6 points higher (40.9 vs 9.3) but costs 35× as much to run the benchmark ($1623 vs $46.4; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Mistral Large 3 when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | Mistral Large 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.9 | 9.3 | −77.3% Mistral Large 3 is 77.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,622.73 | $46.41 | −97.1% Mistral Large 3 is 97.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.13s | 7.18s | −78.3% Mistral Large 3 is 78.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.50 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 3 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 77.3% less intelligence, 97.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 78.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Mistral Large 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)Mistral Large 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/mistral-large-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/mistral-large-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill