Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google or Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) scores 26.7 points higher (40.9 vs 14.2) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1623 vs $1264; both premium class). Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Medium 3.5.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.9 | 14.2 | −65.3% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 65.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,622.73 | $1,263.80 | −22.1% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 22.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.13s | 17.96s | −45.8% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 45.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $1.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 65.3% less intelligence, 22.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 45.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)Mistral Medium 3.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/mistral-medium-3-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/mistral-medium-3-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill