Gemini 4 Argon (High) vs GPT-5 mini (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Argon (High) by Google or GPT-5 mini (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Argon (High) scores 35.8 points higher (52.6 vs 16.8) but costs 13× as much to run the benchmark ($2407 vs $189; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Argon (High) when you need intelligence above 16.8, and GPT-5 mini (High) when 16.8 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon (High) | GPT-5 mini (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.6 | 16.8 | −68.1% GPT-5 mini (High) is 68.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,407.24 | $188.66 | −92.2% GPT-5 mini (High) is 92.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 64.86s | 60.90s | −6.1% GPT-5 mini (High) is 6.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.25 / $2.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5 mini (High) vs Gemini 4 Argon (High): 68.1% less intelligence, 92.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 6.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Argon (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- GPT-5 mini (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Gemini 4 Argon (High)GPT-5 mini (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/gpt-5-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/gpt-5-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill