Gemini 4 Argon (High) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Argon (High) by Google or GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Argon (High) scores 1.6 points higher (52.6 vs 51.0) but costs 3.6× as much to run the benchmark ($2407 vs $662; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Argon (High) when you need intelligence above 51.0, and GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) when 51.0 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon (High) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.6 | 51.0 | −3.0% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 3.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,407.24 | $662.28 | −72.5% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 72.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 65.70s | 86.31s | +31.4% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 31.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) vs Gemini 4 Argon (High): 3.0% less intelligence, 72.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 31.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Argon (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 4 Argon (High)GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill