Gemini 4 Argon (High) vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Argon (High) by Google or Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Argon (High) scores 38.4 points higher (52.6 vs 14.2) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($2407 vs $1264; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Gemini 4 Argon (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Medium 3.5.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon (High) | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.6 | 14.2 | −73.0% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 73.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,407.24 | $1,263.80 | −47.5% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 47.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 63.20s | 17.66s | −72.1% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 72.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $1.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon (High): 73.0% less intelligence, 47.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 72.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Argon (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 4 Argon (High)Mistral Medium 3.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/mistral-medium-3-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/mistral-medium-3-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill