Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) by Google or GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-03.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) scores 3.2 points higher (57.7 vs 54.5) but costs 5.3× as much to run the benchmark ($5903 vs $1124; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) when you need intelligence above 54.5, and GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) when 54.5 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 57.7 | 54.5 | −5.5% GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is 5.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,903.03 | $1,123.97 | −81.0% GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is 81.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.62s | 313.31s | +2596.3% GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is 2596.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium): 5.5% less intelligence, 81.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2596.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium)GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-medium/gpt-6-1-sol · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-medium/gpt-6-1-sol?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill