Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) by Google or GPT-6.1 Sol (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-03.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) scores 7.5 points higher (57.7 vs 50.2) but costs 10× as much to run the benchmark ($5903 vs $573; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) when you need intelligence above 50.2, and GPT-6.1 Sol (High) when 50.2 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) | GPT-6.1 Sol (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 57.7 | 50.2 | −13.0% GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is 13.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,903.03 | $573.17 | −90.3% GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is 90.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.62s | 76.91s | +561.9% GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is 561.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (High) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium): 13.0% less intelligence, 90.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 561.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium)GPT-6.1 Sol (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-medium/gpt-6-1-sol-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-medium/gpt-6-1-sol-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill