Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) vs Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) by Google or Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-02.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) scores 28.2 points higher (57.7 vs 29.5) but costs 2.9× as much to run the benchmark ($5903 vs $2009; both flagship class). Pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Ling 3.1 Flash 1019.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) | Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 57.7 | 29.5 | −48.9% Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is 48.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,903.03 | $2,009.23 | −66.0% Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is 66.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium): 48.9% less intelligence, 66.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium)Ling 3.1 Flash 1019Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-medium/ling-3-1-flash-1019 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-medium/ling-3-1-flash-1019?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill