Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) by Google or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-03.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) scores 31.6 points higher (58.3 vs 26.7) but costs 56× as much to run the benchmark ($5903 vs $106; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) when you need intelligence above 26.7, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash when 26.7 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 58.3 | 26.7 | −54.2% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 54.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,903.03 | $106.14 | −98.2% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 98.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 32.32s | 77.27s | +139.1% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 139.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium): 54.2% less intelligence, 98.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 139.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium)MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-medium/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-medium/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill