Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) by Google or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-02.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) scores 14.4 points higher (57.7 vs 43.3) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($5903 vs $5414; both flagship class). Pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Wonder (Max).
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 57.7 | 43.3 | −25.0% Muse Wonder (Max) is 25.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,903.03 | $5,414.45 | −8.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 8.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 40.51s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium): 25.0% less intelligence, 8.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.00 for $4766.
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-medium/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-medium/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill