Gemini 4 Carbon (High) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by Google or GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) scores 4.9 points higher (59.4 vs 54.5) but costs 7.3× as much to run the benchmark ($8240 vs $1124; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (High) when you need intelligence above 54.5, and GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) when 54.5 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (High) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 59.4 | 54.5 | −8.2% GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is 8.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $8,239.69 | $1,123.97 | −86.4% GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is 86.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 105.19s | 257.61s | +144.9% GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is 144.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (High): 8.2% less intelligence, 86.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 144.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/gpt-6-1-sol · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/gpt-6-1-sol?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill