Gemini 4 Carbon (High) vs Mistral Large 4 (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by Google or Mistral Large 4 (High) by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) scores 33.4 points higher (59.4 vs 26.0) but costs 6.1× as much to run the benchmark ($8240 vs $1359; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (High) when you need intelligence above 26.0, and Mistral Large 4 (High) when 26.0 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (High) | Mistral Large 4 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 59.4 | 26.0 | −56.2% Mistral Large 4 (High) is 56.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $8,239.69 | $1,359.47 | −83.5% Mistral Large 4 (High) is 83.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 108.23s | 16.92s | −84.4% Mistral Large 4 (High) is 84.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.70 / $2.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 (High) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (High): 56.2% less intelligence, 83.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 84.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Mistral Large 4 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)Mistral Large 4 (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill