Gemini 4 Carbon (High) vs Mistral Large 4 (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by Google or Mistral Large 4 (Medium) by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-30.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) scores 36.3 points higher (59.4 vs 23.1) but costs 8.8× as much to run the benchmark ($8240 vs $936; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (High) when you need intelligence above 23.1, and Mistral Large 4 (Medium) when 23.1 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (High) | Mistral Large 4 (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 59.4 | 23.1 | −61.1% Mistral Large 4 (Medi… is 61.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $8,239.69 | $936.36 | −88.6% Mistral Large 4 (Medi… is 88.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 109.02s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.70 / $2.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 (Medium) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (High): 61.1% less intelligence, 88.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Mistral Large 4 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.30 for $718.
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)Mistral Large 4 (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/mistral-large-4-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/mistral-large-4-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill