Gemini 4 Carbon (High) vs Muse Ember (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by Google or Muse Ember (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) scores 24.0 points higher (60.0 vs 36.0) but costs 70× as much to run the benchmark ($8240 vs $117; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (High) when you need intelligence above 36.0, and Muse Ember (Max) when 36.0 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (High) | Muse Ember (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 60.0 | 36.0 | −40.0% Muse Ember (Max) is 40.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $8,239.69 | $117.12 | −98.6% Muse Ember (Max) is 98.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 103.67s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Muse Ember (Max) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (High): 40.0% less intelligence, 98.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) scores 61.80 for $7106.
- Muse Ember (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)Muse Ember (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/muse-ember · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/muse-ember?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill