Gemini 4 Carbon (High) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by Google or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) scores 53.1 points higher (59.4 vs 6.3) but costs 45× as much to run the benchmark ($8240 vs $182; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (High) when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (High) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 59.4 | 6.3 | −89.4% Muse Glimmer (High) is 89.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $8,239.69 | $181.95 | −97.8% Muse Glimmer (High) is 97.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 102.49s | 25.03s | −75.6% Muse Glimmer (High) is 75.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (High): 89.4% less intelligence, 97.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 75.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 29.60 for $121.
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill