Gemini 4 Carbon (High) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by Google or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) scores 23.0 points higher (59.4 vs 36.4) but costs 4.3× as much to run the benchmark ($8240 vs $1906; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (High) when you need intelligence above 36.4, and Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when 36.4 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (High) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 59.4 | 36.4 | −38.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 38.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $8,239.69 | $1,905.84 | −76.9% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 76.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 102.49s | 47.49s | −53.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 53.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (High): 38.7% less intelligence, 76.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 53.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill