Gemini 4 Carbon (High) vs Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by Google or Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) scores 34.7 points higher (59.4 vs 24.7) but costs 4.9× as much to run the benchmark ($8240 vs $1697; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (High) when you need intelligence above 24.7, and Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) when 24.7 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (High) | Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 59.4 | 24.7 | −58.4% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 58.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $8,239.69 | $1,697.21 | −79.4% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 79.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 102.49s | 18.47s | −82.0% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 82.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (High): 58.4% less intelligence, 79.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/muse-spark-open · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/muse-spark-open?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill