Gemini 4 Carbon (High) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by Google or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) scores 16.1 points higher (59.4 vs 43.3) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($8240 vs $5414; both flagship class). Pick Gemini 4 Carbon (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Wonder (Max).
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (High) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 59.4 | 43.3 | −27.1% Muse Wonder (Max) is 27.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $8,239.69 | $5,414.45 | −34.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 34.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 102.49s | 34.66s | −66.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 66.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (High): 27.1% less intelligence, 34.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 66.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.00 for $4766.
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill