Gemma 3n E4B Instruct Preview (May '25) vs Granite 4.2 30B
Gemma 3n E4B Instruct Preview (May '25) vs Granite 4.2 30B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemma 3n E4B Instruct Preview (May '25) | Granite 4.2 30B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 5.8 | 12.7 | +119.0% Granite 4.2 30B is 2.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $110.83 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 55.20s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | — | $0.16 / $0.65 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Speech, Video | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-preview-0520/granite-4-2-30b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-preview-0520/granite-4-2-30b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill