Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-4.6 (Reasoning)

Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-4.6 (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
9.40
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
18.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)GLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)9.418.5+96.8% GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) is 96.8% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)6.39s78.56s+1129.4% GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) is 1129.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.30$0.55 / $2.20
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning): what beats itGLM-4.6 (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-12b-non-reasoning/glm-4-6-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-12b-non-reasoning/glm-4-6-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill