Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Astra (Low)

Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Astra (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
9.40
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-6 Astra (Low)Off the frontier
Intelligence
45.80
Total cost
$1537
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)GPT-6 Astra (Low)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)9.445.8+387.2% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 4.9× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,536.78— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)6.42s12.56s+95.6% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 95.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.30$10.0 / $50.0
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-6 Astra (Low): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-12b-non-reasoning/gpt-6-astra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-12b-non-reasoning/gpt-6-astra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill