Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning) vs o3

Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning) vs o3. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
9.40
Total cost
-
OpenAIo3Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)o3Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)9.420.2+114.9% o3 is 2.1× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)6.40s11.00s+71.9% o3 is 71.9% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.30$2.00 / $8.00
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning): what beats ito3: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-12b-non-reasoning/o3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-12b-non-reasoning/o3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill