Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning) vs o3-mini

Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning) vs o3-mini. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
9.40
Total cost
-
OpenAIo3-miniNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
12.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)o3-miniDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)9.412.5+33.0% o3-mini is 33.0% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)6.40s8.61s+34.5% o3-mini is 34.5% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.30$1.10 / $4.40
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning): what beats ito3-mini: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-12b-non-reasoning/o3-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-12b-non-reasoning/o3-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill