Gemma 4 12B (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)
Gemma 4 12B (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemma 4 12B (Reasoning) | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.2 | 20.7 | +45.8% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 45.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $331.24 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.99s | 80.67s | +236.3% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 236.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $0.20 / $1.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-12b/gpt-5-4-nano · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-12b/gpt-5-4-nano?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill