Gemma 4 12B (Reasoning) vs GPT-5 nano (High)

Gemma 4 12B (Reasoning) vs GPT-5 nano (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 12B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.20
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-5 nano (High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 12B (Reasoning)GPT-5 nano (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)14.213.0−8.5% GPT-5 nano (High) is 8.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)24.28s77.63s+219.7% GPT-5 nano (High) is 219.7% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.30$0.05 / $0.40
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 12B (Reasoning): what beats itGPT-5 nano (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-12b/gpt-5-nano · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-12b/gpt-5-nano?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill