Gemma 4 12B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)

Gemma 4 12B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 12B (Reasoning)Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)14.27.2−49.3% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 49.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)24.02s91.88s+282.5% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 282.5% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.30$0.24 / $0.54
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-12b/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-12b/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill