Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.2 (Max)

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.2 (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.10
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-5.2 (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
33.70
Total cost
$2097
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning)GLM-5.2 (Max)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.133.7+157.3% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 2.6× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$2,097.29— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)5.56s28.14s+406.1% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 406.1% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.12 / $0.40$1.40 / $4.40
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning): what beats itGLM-5.2 (Max): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-non-reasoning/glm-5-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-non-reasoning/glm-5-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill